Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

'Look Mum, one point': Why does the UK keep getting Eurovision wrong?

Published

on

Another year, another flop. The UK has self-destructed at Eurovision all over again.

Look Mum No Computer, aka musician Sam Battle, got one solitary point, ending up in last place.

It's the third time we've been at the bottom of the table since 2020. We've made the top 10 once since 2010. This is the fourth consecutive year I've written a post-mortem on our failure.

Believe me, I don't want to be here – but here we are.

In the run-up to the contest, there was little hope that Sam's shouty synth-pop banger Eins, Zwei, Drei, would fare well.

But the musician gave it his all, stomping around the stage in a bright pink boiler suit while singing about quitting his office job so he could go to Germany and count to three (I am not making this up).

It was, as Graham Norton observed, "a big swing".

If anything, our previous Eurovision entries played it too safe, pandering to a cliché of polished electro-pop.

Sam was different. Eccentric and engaging, with the uncontainable energy of a shaken-up Coke bottle, he came up with a song that, for once, sounded uniquely British.

"I have to applaud the BBC for the ambition," says Adrian Bradley of the Euro Trip podcast, which follows the competition's ups-and-downs.

"They took a risk on something that maybe people won't like, but which some people might pick up the phone and vote for."

"I think it's a very interesting song in terms of production," agrees Satoshi, who represented Moldova at this year's contest.

"The distortion on the voice, the synths that he uses. Everything has that British imprint – but I can definitely see that it's not everyone's cup of tea."

"What we're doing is Marmite," he told BBC News before the contest. "You either love it or hate it – but I think there's a slot open for our sort of thing."

The song's hiccupy beat, and zany references to jam roly poly and custard left Europe bewildered. Juries awarded it one point. The public gave it zero.

"I think the song, honestly, is not a great song for the UK," says Filippo Baglini, a journalist for the Italian station London One Radio.

"The UK is the best at music all around the world. You have the Beatles and everything. So this is not good enough."

"I really wish the BBC would take it more seriously," agrees Thomas Tammegger, an Austrian Eurovision fan, living in Denmark.

"They look at it through a lens of it being a funny event and then you have to send novelty entries or joke entries and it never really does well.

"When they do make an effort, like with Sam Ryder, voila! It's second place and it works."

Ah yes, Sam Ryder. A drop of water in 15 years of drought. He was the runner-up in 2022, armed with the cunning plan of writing a good song – the 70s glam rock pastiche Space Man – and being good at performing it.

Well, in the words of Will Young, who turned down the chance to represent the UK in 2015, Eurovision is considered a "poisoned chalice".

No established recording artist wants to represent the UK in case it damages their career. When they do – like Olly Alexander in 2024 – they're stung by the reaction.

Alexander, who went into debt to his record label to pay for the staging, called the experience "brutal" and advised future contestants to "get a good therapist".

Since then, the BBC has relied on less-established talent. Both Look Mum No Computer and 2025 contestants Remember Monday are independent artists, without the backing of a major record label.

When I explain the situation to other Eurovision contestants in Vienna, they're shocked.

"In the UK there's a bad perception of representing your country at Eurovision?" asks a perplexed Satoshi. "Well, that's not good.

"I can understand that the UK has delivered so many powerful acts to the world that you don't have to rely on Eurovision to get awareness, but I think it's a wonderful contest to emphasise your musical potential."

Dara, who won the contest with her song Bangaranga, agrees.

Aa a pop star with 10 years of hits under her belt, she says big artists need to shed their prejudices about Eurovision.

"I don't know what's stopping them from experiencing this amazing place," she said at her post-victory press conference.

"You might be from bigger country than Bulgaria, but whatever. Don't be afraid to jump into a new reality, into risk, and to try new things. That's what makes life fun, and you will feel alive."

The UK’s scorn for Eurovision is something Finland also used to struggle with.

After Lordi's victory in 2006, the country experienced a devastating 15-year slump.

In that time, Finland never made the top 10 again. On seven occasions, they even failed to qualify from the semi-finals.

"We were pessimists for many years," says Katariina Kähkönen, a reporter at Finland's MTV Uutiset. "People were always like, 'No, it doesn't matter – the Eurovision thing. Finland will never win.'"

But since the pandemic, they've turned things around, entering classics like Käärijä's Cha Cha Cha (second place, 2023) and coming sixth this year with Linda Lampenius and Pete Parkkonen's Liekenheiten.

To find out what changed, we went straight to the man responsible – Matti Myllyaho.

He's the show producer for Finland, and also organises Uuden Musiikin Kilpailu (UMK), a massive televised contest that's selected the country's entry every year since 2012.

He credits pop diva Erika Vikman with turning the tide, after appearing at UMK in 2020.

"She had this song Cicciolina, which was outrageously quirky – but it got artistic acclaim, and then it did really well commercially.

"That started a snowball effect. A lot of artists after that were like, 'Wait, this could be something for me'."

Cicciolina came second at UMK, but suddenly established rock acts like The Rasmus were willing to consider playing Eurovision.

Myllyaho also recognised the value of leaning into Finland's eccentricity, with Käärijä's rave metal anthem Cha Cha Cha becoming the breakout hit of Eurovision 2023 in Liverpool.

Then Vikman returned last year with the sexually suggestive Ich Komme – which she performed astride a giant airborne microphone, cementing her place in Eurovision history.

It only came 11th (a travesty), but Myllyaho says winning is overrated.

"When Olly Alexander received zero points from the public two years ago, he immediately came backstage and said, 'Honestly, that's kind of iconic'.

"There's virtue in owning that. Ultimately, success is about creating pop culture moments."

So what would he do if he was put in charge of the UK's entry?

"In Finland, we started to realise our strengths, and own our slight weirdness," he says.

"It's hard to speak for the UK, but I think the path I'd recommend any Eurovision project to follow would be to, like, just own your quirkiness."

Except the BBC went down the wacky route this year, only to fail again.

The problem is that, in order to succeed, you need to 10 things to align: The right song; an artist who can sing it live, who is preferably recognisable, with a relatable story to tell; impressive staging; public support; good promotion; an advantageous place in the running order; pre-show buzz; and a pinch of good old fashioned luck.

The BBC typically has the jigsaw almost complete, only to lose two of the pieces under the floorboards.

Myllyaho admits that getting the balance right is hard work.

"We're in touch with labels and artists all year round – but as more hits and stars and stories come out of Eurovision, it's a self-reinforcing loop.

"Because there's nothing quite like it. It's such a unique opportunity to put on a high-production performance in front of millions of people. You can't really get that anywhere else, can you?"

More on the Eurovision Song Contest 2026:

Having squandered the good-will created by Sam Ryder's success, the BBC delegation now has the tricky task of pushing the boulder back up the hill.

Perhaps the next couple of months could be spent courting record labels and songwriters, instead of leaning on

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy72e81dp28o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Iranian group could be labelled national threat under proposed new law

Published

on

Legislation which would enable the home secretary to designate some state-linked organisations such as Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a threat to national security could come into force as early as next month.

The National Security (State Threats) Bill was introduced to Parliament on Tuesday, and could become law within weeks.

It would allow Shabana Mahmood to designate groups involved in "foreign power threat activity" such as assassination attempts, surveillance and sabotage.

The bill also creates three new criminal offences, including one of supporting a designated state threat organisation and two of assisting and accepting material benefit from such a group.

The legislation was suggested by the government's Independent Reviewer of State Threats Legislation Jonathan Hall KC, when he concluded that it was difficult to ban state-linked groups like the IRGC as terrorist organisations.

In the last year, men have been convicted of spying on Hong Kong dissidents in the UK on behalf of China, carrying out an arson attack on a Ukrainian warehouse on behalf of the Russian group Wagner, and stabbing an opposition journalist in Wimbledon on behalf of Iran.

In those last two cases, the people who carried out the attacks were criminals who were doing it for money.

These cases showed that often hostile foreign powers were not only using their intelligence agencies to undermine security in the UK, but were also hiring criminal proxies through other state-linked organisations such as the Wagner Group and the IRGC.

It meant that the National Security Act 2023, which focused on foreign intelligence services, was quickly out of date.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: "Where foreign states are found to be engaging in activity that threatens lives or undermines our democratic institutions, we must ensure that such actions have consequences.

"We will not tolerate hostile actors paying petty criminals to do their dirty work."

Mahmood said: "Foreign states are becoming ever more aggressive – attacking our communities, our way of life, and our institutions – and hiding their tracks behind proxies.

The bill is seen in Whitehall as a vital upgrade of the National Security Act which was only passed three years ago.

Officials say they have been seeing unprecedented levels of threat from people and groups working on behalf of foreign states.

The Director General of MI5, Sir Ken McCallum, said the security service had "tracked more than 20 potentially lethal Iran-backed plots" in just one year.

The prime minister and home secretary fast-tracked the legislation after recent attacks on Jewish targets.

Several of those were claimed by a new group calling itself Harakat Ashab al-Yamin.

The IRGC was set up after the 1979 revolution to defend the country's new Islamic system, but has since become a powerful arm of the state with a reach beyond Iran's borders.

In the impact assessment accompanying the bill, it is anticipated that 10 or fewer organisations will be designated as state threats in the first year after the legislation is passed.

Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgqj8xzkqqyo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Construction on fire site by Glasgow Central Station might not start for several years

Published

on

The leader of Glasgow City Council has said construction work on the Union Corner site destroyed by fire earlier this year might not begin for five or six years.

Susan Aitken added that the planning and consultation process regarding the land is likely to last until about 2030, partly because the wrecked building has a complicated ownership structure.

She made the comments at an event organised by online newspaper The Glasgow Bell last week. Glasgow City Council said it was exploring options for the site in the short, medium and long term.

A devastating fire broke out on Union Street on 8 March, initially starting in a vape shop on Union Street and then spreading further up the street.

The building is managed by property company Stelmain on behalf of Dunaskin Properties, while the ground-floor retail unit where the fire began is owned by Afton Estates.

Multiple ownership means it is likely to take time before development proposals start to be looked at.

BBC Scotland News understands the council leader's estimated timescale is shared by other senior officials within the local authority.

A spokesperson for Glasgow City Council said: "We are continuing to work on making the site safe – at this point, focusing on works on the western gable wall – with a view to reopening Union Street as quickly as possible.

"Beyond that, we are working with the owners on how the site will look and feel and how it could be used in the short, medium and long-term."

A recovery group has already been convened, which includes representatives of design and architecture companies.

Only the façade of the building at the corner of Gordon Street and Union Street was left standing after the fire in March.

The building known as Union Corner, dates back to 1851, pre-dating Glasgow Central Station which opened in 1879.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd7wx7409g7o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Hidden camera found in government building

Published

on

A hidden camera has been discovered in a government building in the heart of Westminster.

The electronic device was found in the communal area of the complex on Marsham Street, where the Home Office and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) are based.

The i newspaper, which first reported the story, said it was found behind a ceiling panel within the last two months, and security services have been informed.

Home Office sources say it was found in MHCLG's part of the building, away from ministerial offices. An MHCLG spokesperson said: "We do not comment on security matters."

The building is the base for the Home Office, responsible for policing in England and Wales and national security, and MHCLG, which is responsible for housing and planning policy in England.

Tory shadow Cabinet Office minister Alex Burghart said: "This is a serious incident that demands an urgent investigation.

"The discovery of a hidden camera inside a building that occupies the Home Office and other departments raises questions about the security of government departments and those seeking to undermine them.

"The public deserves answers. We urgently need to know who was responsible, how long this device was in place and whether any sensitive or classified information has been compromised."

The Home Office declined to comment. The prime minister's spokesman declined to comment, referring reporters to the earlier statement from MHCLG.

Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c802r4xnkrxo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.